Free Counters from SimpleCount.com
[Web Counters]


[RETURN TO FRONT PAGE] [THE NEXT PAGE]

The web address of this page is: <http://www.German-University.org/INDEX-02__000.html>


THE GREAT CLIMATE FIGURE SWINDLE IS NOW EXPOSED [01]
February 14, 2010 - Climategate's Phil Jones Confesses to Climate Fraud - By Marc Sheppard [01]
01
From: Joe Bryant <succeed@alt3.net>
To: Joe Bryant <succeed@alt3.net>
Subject: conned
Date: Dec 15, 2007 7:24 PM
Attachments:

Man made global warming is a dangerous con.
The fact that TV news programs repeatedly show – steam-cooling-water-recovery-collection-towers – deceptively to represent CO2 emissions should be sufficient evidence for even the most dumbed-down individual to see that somebody is desperate to con somebody.

Today’s big question is: are our “leaders” being conned, or are they part of the con.

One of the penalties for not taking an interest in politics is
that you end up being governed by your inferiors”.
- Plato 400BC


The National Post Canada

Don't fight, adapt

We should give up futile attempts to combat climate change
Published: Wednesday, December 12, 2007

UN Sec. Gen.

Sonny Tumbelaka/AFP/Getty Images
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon at the UN climate conference in Bali

Open Letter to the Secretary-General of the United Nations

Dec. 13, 2007

His Excellency Ban Ki-Moon

Secretary-General, United Nations

New York, N.Y.

Dear Mr. Secretary-General,

Re: UN climate conference taking the World in entirely the wrong direction

It is not possible to stop climate change, a natural phenomenon that has affected humanity through the ages. Geological, archaeological, oral and written histories all attest to the dramatic challenges posed to past societies from unanticipated changes in temperature, precipitation, winds and other climatic variables. We therefore need to equip nations to become resilient to the full range of these natural phenomena by promoting economic growth and wealth generation.

The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has issued increasingly alarming conclusions about the climatic influences of human-produced carbon dioxide (CO2), a non-polluting gas that is essential to plant photosynthesis. While we understand the evidence that has led them to view CO2 emissions as harmful, the IPCC's conclusions are quite inadequate as justification for implementing policies that will markedly diminish future prosperity. In particular, it is not established that it is possible to significantly alter global climate through cuts in human greenhouse gas emissions. On top of which, because attempts to cut emissions will slow development, the current UN approach of CO2 reduction is likely to increase human suffering from future climate change rather than to decrease it.

The IPCC Summaries for Policy Makers are the most widely read IPCC reports amongst politicians and non-scientists and are the basis for most climate change policy formulation. Yet these Summaries are prepared by a relatively small core writing team with the final drafts approved line-by-line by ­government ­representatives. The great ­majority of IPCC contributors and ­reviewers, and the tens of thousands of other scientists who are qualified to comment on these matters, are not involved in the preparation of these documents. The summaries therefore cannot properly be represented as a consensus view among experts.

Contrary to the impression left by the IPCC Summary reports:

z Recent observations of phenomena such as glacial retreats, sea-level rise and the migration of temperature-sensitive species are not evidence for abnormal climate change, for none of these changes has been shown to lie outside the bounds of known natural variability.

z The average rate of warming of 0.1 to 0. 2 degrees Celsius per decade recorded by satellites during the late 20th century falls within known natural rates of warming and cooling over the last 10,000 years.

z Leading scientists, including some senior IPCC representatives, acknowledge that today's computer models cannot predict climate. Consistent with this, and despite computer projections of temperature rises, there has been no net global warming since 1998. That the current temperature plateau follows a late 20th-century period of warming is consistent with the continuation today of natural multi-decadal or millennial climate cycling.

In stark contrast to the often repeated assertion that the science of climate change is "settled," significant new peer-reviewed research has cast even more doubt on the hypothesis of dangerous human-caused global warming. But because IPCC working groups were generally instructed
(see: <http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/docs/wg1_timetable_2006-08-14.pdf>) to consider work published only through May, 2005, these important findings are not included in their reports; i.e., the IPCC assessment reports are already materially outdated.

The UN climate conference in Bali has been planned to take the world along a path of severe CO2 restrictions, ignoring the lessons apparent from the failure of the Kyoto Protocol, the chaotic nature of the European CO2 trading market, and the ineffectiveness of other costly initiatives to curb greenhouse gas emissions. Balanced cost/benefit analyses provide no support for the introduction of global measures to cap and reduce energy consumption for the purpose of restricting CO2 emissions. Furthermore, it is irrational to apply the "precautionary principle" because many scientists recognize that both climatic coolings and warmings are realistic possibilities over the medium-term future.

The current UN focus on "fighting climate change," as illustrated in the Nov. 27 UN Development Programme's Human Development Report, is distracting governments from adapting to the threat of inevitable natural climate changes, whatever forms they may take. National and international planning for such changes is needed, with a focus on helping our most vulnerable citizens adapt to conditions that lie ahead. Attempts to prevent global climate change from occurring are ultimately futile, and constitute a tragic misallocation of resources that would be better spent on humanity's real and pressing problems.

Yours faithfully,

 

Signatories of an open letter on the UN climate-conference

Published: Wednesday, December 12, 2007

The following are signatories to the Dec. 13th letter to the Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General of the United Nations on the UN Climate conference in Bali:

Don Aitkin, PhD, Professor, social scientist, retired vice-chancellor and president, University of Canberra, Australia

William J.R. Alexander, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Dept. of Civil and Biosystems Engineering, University of Pretoria, South Africa; Member, UN Scientific and Technical Committee on Natural Disasters, 1994-2000

Bjarne Andresen, PhD, physicist, Professor, The Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Geoff L. Austin, PhD, FNZIP, FRSNZ, Professor, Dept. of Physics, University of Auckland, New Zealand

Timothy F. Ball, PhD, environmental consultant, former climatology professor, University of Winnipeg

Ernst-Georg Beck, Dipl. Biol., Biologist, Merian-Schule Freiburg, Germany

Sonja A. Boehmer-Christiansen, PhD, Reader, Dept. of Geography, Hull University, U.K.; Editor, Energy & Environment journal

Chris C. Borel, PhD, remote sensing scientist, U.S.

Reid A. Bryson, PhD, DSc, DEngr, UNE P. Global 500 Laureate; Senior Scientist, Center for Climatic Research; Emeritus Professor of Meteorology, of Geography, and of Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin

Dan Carruthers, M.Sc., wildlife biology consultant specializing in animal ecology in Arctic and Subarctic regions, Alberta

R.M. Carter, PhD, Professor, Marine Geophysical Laboratory, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia

Ian D. Clark, PhD, Professor, isotope hydrogeology and paleoclimatology, Dept. of Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa

Richard S. Courtney, PhD, climate and atmospheric science consultant, IPCC expert reviewer, U.K.

Willem de Lange, PhD, Dept. of Earth and Ocean Sciences, School of Science and Engineering, Waikato University, New Zealand

David Deming, PhD (Geophysics), Associate Professor, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Oklahoma

Freeman J. Dyson, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Institute for Advanced Studies, Princeton, N.J.

Don J. Easterbrook, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Geology, Western Washington University

Lance Endersbee, Emeritus Professor, former dean of Engineering and Pro-Vice Chancellor of Monasy University, Australia

Hans Erren, Doctorandus, geophysicist and climate specialist, Sittard, The Netherlands

Robert H. Essenhigh, PhD, E.G. Bailey Professor of Energy Conversion, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University

Christopher Essex, PhD, Professor of Applied Mathematics and Associate Director of the Program in Theoretical Physics, University of Western Ontario

David Evans, PhD, mathematician, carbon accountant, computer and electrical engineer and head of 'Science Speak,' Australia

William Evans, PhD, editor, American Midland Naturalist; Dept. of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame

Stewart Franks, PhD, Professor, Hydroclimatologist, University of Newcastle, Australia

R. W. Gauldie, PhD, Research Professor, Hawai'i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, School of Ocean Earth Sciences and Technology, University of Hawai'i at Manoa

Lee C. Gerhard, PhD, Senior Scientist Emeritus, University of Kansas; former director and state geologist, Kansas Geological Survey

Gerhard Gerlich, Professor for Mathematical and Theoretical Physics, Institut für Mathematische Physik der TU Braunschweig, Germany

Albrecht Glatzle, PhD, sc.agr., Agro-Biologist and Gerente ejecutivo, INTTAS, Paraguay

Fred Goldberg, PhD, Adjunct Professor, Royal Institute of Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Stockholm, Sweden

Vincent Gray, PhD, expert reviewer for the IPCC and author of The Greenhouse Delusion: A Critique of 'Climate Change 2001, Wellington, New Zealand

William M. Gray, Professor Emeritus, Dept. of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University and Head of the Tropical Meteorology Project

Howard Hayden, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Physics, University of Connecticut

Louis Hissink MSc, M.A.I.G., editor, AIG News, and consulting geologist, Perth, Western Australia

Craig D. Idso, PhD, Chairman, Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, Arizona

Sherwood B. Idso, PhD, President, Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, AZ, USA

Andrei Illarionov, PhD, Senior Fellow, Center for Global Liberty and Prosperity; founder and director of the Institute of Economic Analysis

Zbigniew Jaworowski, PhD, physicist, Chairman - Scientific Council of Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection, Warsaw, Poland

Jon Jenkins, PhD, MD, computer modelling - virology, NSW, Australia

Wibjorn Karlen, PhD, Emeritus Professor, Dept. of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology, Stockholm University, Sweden

Olavi Kärner, Ph.D., Research Associate, Dept. of Atmospheric Physics, Institute of Astrophysics and Atmospheric Physics, Toravere, Estonia

Joel M. Kauffman, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Chemistry, University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

David Kear, PhD, FRSNZ, CMG, geologist, former Director-General of NZ Dept. of Scientific & Industrial Research, New Zealand

Madhav Khandekar, PhD, former research scientist, Environment Canada; editor, Climate Research (2003-05); editorial board member, Natural Hazards; IPCC expert reviewer 2007

William Kininmonth M.Sc., M.Admin., former head of Australia's National Climate Centre and a consultant to the World Meteorological organization's Commission for Climatology Jan J.H. Kop, MSc Ceng FICE (Civil Engineer Fellow of the Institution of Civil Engineers), Emeritus Prof. of Public Health Engineering, Technical University Delft, The Netherlands

Prof. R.W.J. Kouffeld, Emeritus Professor, Energy Conversion, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands

Salomon Kroonenberg, PhD, Professor, Dept. of Geotechnology, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands

Hans H.J. Labohm, PhD, economist, former advisor to the executive board, Clingendael Institute (The Netherlands Institute of International Relations), The Netherlands

The Rt. Hon. Lord Lawson of Blaby, economist; Chairman of the Central Europe Trust; former Chancellor of the Exchequer, U.K.

Douglas Leahey, PhD, meteorologist and air-quality consultant, Calgary

David R. Legates, PhD, Director, Center for Climatic Research, University of Delaware

Marcel Leroux, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Climatology, University of Lyon, France; former director of Laboratory of Climatology, Risks and Environment, CNRS

Bryan Leyland, International Climate Science Coalition, consultant and power engineer, Auckland, New Zealand

William Lindqvist, PhD, independent consulting geologist, Calif.

Richard S. Lindzen, PhD, Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology, Dept. of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

A.J. Tom van Loon, PhD, Professor of Geology (Quaternary Geology), Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland; former President of the European Association of Science Editors

Anthony R. Lupo, PhD, Associate Professor of Atmospheric Science, Dept. of Soil, Environmental, and Atmospheric Science, University of Missouri-Columbia

Richard Mackey, PhD, Statistician, Australia

Horst Malberg, PhD, Professor for Meteorology and Climatology, Institut für Meteorologie, Berlin, Germany

John Maunder, PhD, Climatologist, former President of the Commission for Climatology of the World Meteorological Organization (89-97), New Zealand

Alister McFarquhar, PhD, international economy, Downing College, Cambridge, U.K.

Ross McKitrick, PhD, Associate Professor, Dept. of Economics, University of Guelph

John McLean, PhD, climate data analyst, computer scientist, Australia

Owen McShane, PhD, economist, head of the International Climate Science Coalition; Director, Centre for Resource Management Studies, New Zealand

Fred Michel, PhD, Director, Institute of Environmental Sciences and Associate Professor of Earth Sciences, Carleton University

Frank Milne, PhD, Professor, Dept. of Economics, Queen's University

Asmunn Moene, PhD, former head of the Forecasting Centre, Meteorological Institute, Norway

Alan Moran, PhD, Energy Economist, Director of the IPA's Deregulation Unit, Australia

Nils-Axel Morner, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Paleogeophysics & Geodynamics, Stockholm University, Sweden

Lubos Motl, PhD, Physicist, former Harvard string theorist, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

John Nicol, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Physics, James Cook University, Australia

David Nowell, M.Sc., Fellow of the Royal Meteorological Society, former chairman of the NATO Meteorological Group, Ottawa

James J. O'Brien, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Meteorology and Oceanography, Florida State University

Cliff Ollier, PhD, Professor Emeritus (Geology), Research Fellow, University of Western Australia

Garth W. Paltridge, PhD, atmospheric physicist, Emeritus Professor and former Director of the Institute of Antarctic and Southern Ocean Studies, University of Tasmania, Australia

R. Timothy Patterson, PhD, Professor, Dept. of Earth Sciences (paleoclimatology), Carleton University

Al Pekarek, PhD, Associate Professor of Geology, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Dept., St. Cloud State University, Minnesota

Ian Plimer, PhD, Professor of Geology, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide and Emeritus Professor of Earth Sciences, University of Melbourne, Australia

Brian Pratt, PhD, Professor of Geology, Sedimentology, University of Saskatchewan

Harry N.A. Priem, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Planetary Geology and Isotope Geophysics, Utrecht University; former director of the Netherlands Institute for Isotope Geosciences

Alex Robson, PhD, Economics, Australian National University Colonel F.P.M. Rombouts, Branch Chief - Safety, Quality and Environment, Royal Netherland Air Force

R.G. Roper, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Sciences, School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology

Arthur Rorsch, PhD, Emeritus Professor, Molecular Genetics, Leiden University, The Netherlands

Rob Scagel, M.Sc., forest microclimate specialist, principal consultant, Pacific Phytometric Consultants, B.C.

Tom V. Segalstad, PhD, (Geology/Geochemistry), Head of the Geological Museum and Associate Professor of Resource and Environmental Geology, University of Oslo, Norway

Gary D. Sharp, PhD, Center for Climate/Ocean Resources Study, Salinas, CA

S. Fred Singer, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia and former director Weather Satellite Service

L. Graham Smith, PhD, Associate Professor, Dept. of Geography, University of Western Ontario

Roy W. Spencer, PhD, climatologist, Principal Research Scientist, Earth System Science Center, The University of Alabama, Huntsville

Peter Stilbs, TeknD, Professor of Physical Chemistry, Research Leader, School of Chemical Science and Engineering, KTH (Royal Institute of Technology), Stockholm, Sweden

Hendrik Tennekes, PhD, former director of research, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute

Dick Thoenes, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Chemical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands

Brian G Valentine, PhD, PE (Chem.), Technology Manager - Industrial Energy Efficiency, Adjunct Associate Professor of Engineering Science, University of Maryland at College Park; Dept of Energy, Washington, DC

Gerrit J. van der Lingen, PhD, geologist and paleoclimatologist, climate change consultant, Geoscience Research and Investigations, New Zealand

Len Walker, PhD, Power Engineering, Australia

Edward J. Wegman, PhD, Department of Computational and Data Sciences, George Mason University, Virginia

Stephan Wilksch, PhD, Professor for Innovation and Technology Management, Production Management and Logistics, University of Technolgy and Economics Berlin, Germany

Boris Winterhalter, PhD, senior marine researcher (retired), Geological Survey of Finland, former professor in marine geology, University of Helsinki, Finland

David E. Wojick, PhD, P.Eng., energy consultant, Virginia

Raphael Wust, PhD, Lecturer, Marine Geology/Sedimentology, James Cook University, Australia

A. Zichichi, PhD, President of the World Federation of Scientists, Geneva, Switzerland; Emeritus Professor of Advanced Physics, University of Bologna, Italy

02 Fiddling With Figures While the Earth Burns
The Times (Britain) - Thursday, December 20, 2007 -
<http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/ news/uk/science/article1751509.ece>

If you want to get some idea of what much of the Earth might look like in 50 years' time then, says James Lovelock, get hold of a powerful telescope or log onto Nasa's Mars website.  That arid, empty, lifeless landscape is, he believes, how most of Earth's equatorial lands will be looking by 2050.  A few decades later and that same uninhabitable desert will have extended into Spain, Italy, Australia and much of the southern United States.  "We are on the edge of the greatest die-off humanity has ever seen," said Lovelock.  "We will be lucky if 20% of us survive what is coming. We should be scared stiff."

0
03

<http://www.aetherometry.com/global_warming/gw_index.html>

'GLOBAL WARMING': AN OFFICIAL PSEUDOSCIENCE
by Paulo N. Correa, M.Sc., Ph.D. & Alexandra N. Correa, HBA


<http://icecap.us/index.php/go/joes-blog/comments_about_global_warming/>

Sunday, November 11, 2007

Weather Channel Founder: Global Warming 'Greatest Scam in History'


http://icecap.us/images/uploads/JC_comments.doc

 

COMMENTS ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING

By John Coleman

<jcoleman@kusi.com>

it is the greatest scam in history.  I am amazed, appalled and highly offended by it. Global Warming; It is a SCAM.

 


I strongly believe that the next twenty years are equally as likely to see a cooling trend as they are to see a warming trend.

 

 

http://www.nbcaugusta.com/news/national/11114421.html

 

By Rich Rogers rrogers@nbcaugusta.com

Story Updated: Nov 8, 2007 at 7:21 PM EST

 

When John Coleman founded The Weather Channel in the early 1980's, he probably never could have guessed that TWC would be promoting the theory of global warming in the 2000's.

 

That's because Coleman doesn't believe in global warming, or so-called climate change. In a November 7 blog entry on icecap.us, Coleman makes it clear that he does not oppose environmentalism, but he says that global warming is a "non-event, a manufactured crisis and a total scam."

 

"I have read dozens of scientific papers. I have talked with numerous scientists. I have studied. I have thought about it. I know I am correct," Coleman wrote.

 

"The impact of humans on climate is not catastrophic. Our planet is not in peril."

 

Coleman believes that in time, the global warming theory will be proven to be a scam when none of the predicted catastrophic events, such as coastal flooding and super storms, actually materialize.

 

Coleman also criticized CNN, CBS, NBC, the Democratic party, and even California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, calling them "well informed, but very gullible."

 

Coleman now works as a broadcast meteorologist at San Diego's KUSI-TV.

 

The Weather Channel has no comment about Coleman, other than to say that he left the network in 1983 .

 

 

<http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/11/07/weather-channel-founder-global-warming-greatest-scam-history>

 

Weather Channel Founder: Global Warming 'Greatest Scam in History'

By <Noel Sheppard> | November 7, 2007 - 17:58 ET

 

If the founder of The Weather Channel spoke out strongly against the manmade global warming myth, might media members notice?


Related articles:

Harvard Paper Calls Al Gore a Hypocrite

Renowned Environmentalist Calls Biofuels 'Crime Against Humanity'

John Stossel: 'Don't Look to Government to Cool Down the Planet'

UN Climate Panel to Discuss Global Warming at Tropical Resort

Global Warming Tutorial Media Should be Required to Watch

Vote for Stephen McIntyre's Climate Audit as Best Science Blog

-

GLOBAL WARMING ?  Letters to the editor: <http://educate-yourself.org/lte/globalwarming13sep06.shtml>
-




04 States Suing EPA Over Global Warming
By JAY LINDSAY (Associated Press Writer)
From Associated Press
April 02, 2008 2:13 PM EDT

BOSTON - Officials of 18 states are taking the EPA back to court to try to force it to comply with a Supreme Court ruling that rebuked the Bush administration for inaction on global warming.

In a petition prepared for filing Wednesday, the plaintiffs said last April's 5-4 ruling required the Environmental Protection Agency to decide whether to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, including carbon dioxide, from motor vehicles.

The EPA has instead done nothing, they said.

"The EPA's failure to act in the face of these incontestable dangers is a shameful dereliction of duty," Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley said.

The petition asks the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to require the EPA to act within 60 days.

In last year's decision, the Supreme Court ruled the EPA has the authority to regulate emissions from new cars and trucks under the Clean Air Act, and said the reasons the EPA gave for declining to do so were insufficient.

EPA spokesman Jonathan Shradar said the Supreme Court required the agency to evaluate how it would regulate greenhouse gas emissions from cars and other vehicles but set no deadline.

The EPA plans to include the evaluation in a broader look at how to best regulate all greenhouse gas emissions, not just those from vehicles, he said. Otherwise, a mash of laws and regulations could emerge rather than the "holistic" approach the administration favors.

"We want to set a good foundation to build a strong climate policy of potential regulation and laws we can work toward and actually see some success," Shradar said.

The plaintiffs in the latest court action include Coakley and attorneys general from Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and the District of Columbia, plus representatives of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection and the cities of New York and Baltimore, and several environmental organizations.

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


05
Fom: "Klaus W. Friebe" <klausfriebe@web.de>
To: Wolfram Grätz <wolfram1@aaahawk.com>
Subject: Widerlegung C O 2
Date: May 6, 2008 12:59 PM
 
 
Sehr geehrter Herr  Grätz   :
 
Darf ich Ihnen eine wissenschaftliche Widerlegung der  C O 2 - Treibhaus  These  schicken?   Sie stammt von Prof. Dr. Gerhard Gerlich,  TU-Braunschweig,  Institut für Mathematische Physik.   Mitverfasser  Dr. Ralf D. Tscheuschner, Hamburg.
 
Ihr Titel :  Falsification Of  The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics
Cited at: <http://arxiv.org/abs/0707.1161v3>

Version 3.0 (September 9, 2007)

replaces Version 1.0 (July 7, 2007) and later

Wer mitreden will, muß sie gelesen haben.

Der erste Absatz  davon :

                Abstract

The atmospheric greenhouse effect, an idea that authors trace back to the traditional

works of Fourier 1824, Tyndall 1861, and Arrhenius 1896, and which is still supported

in global climatology, essentially describes a fictitious mechanism, in which a planetary

atmosphere acts as a heat pump driven by an environment that is radiatively interacting

with but radiatively equilibrated to the atmospheric system. According to the second law

of thermodynamics such a planetary machine can never exist. Nevertheless, in almost

all texts of global climatology and in a widespread secondary literature it is taken for

granted that such mechanism is real and stands on a rm scienti c foundation. In

this paper the popular conjecture is analyzed and the underlying physical principles are

clari ed. By showing that (a) there are no common physical laws between the warming

phenomenon in glass houses and the ctitious atmospheric greenhouse effects, (b) there

are no calculations to determine an average surface temperature of a planet, (c) the

frequently mentioned diference of 33 C is a meaningless number calculated wrongly,

(d) the formulas of cavity radiation are used inappropriately, (e) the assumption of a

radiative balance is unphysical, (f) thermal conductivity and friction must not be set to

zero, the atmospheric greenhouse conjecture is falsified.

>>>Man kann den Aufsatz abrufen durch  :  <http://www.arxiv.org/abs/0707.1161v3>

 

Der Aufsatz umfaßt  100 Seiten DIN A4,  die Sendung also 1,2  MB.

 

Aus dem Inhalts-Verzeichnis  :   

3 The fictitious atmospheric greenhouse effects

3.1 Problem definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.2 Scientific error versus scientific fraud . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

3.3 Different versions of the atmospheric greenhouse conjecture . . . . . . . . . . . 38

3.3.1 Atmospheric greenhouse effect after Moller (1973) . . . . . . . . . . . . 38

3.3.2 Atmospheric greenhouse effect after Meyer's encyclopedia (1974) . . . . 38

3.3.3 Atmospheric greenhouse effect after Schonwiese (1987) . . . . . . . . . 38

3.3.4 Atmospheric greenhouse effect after Stichel (1995) . . . . . . . . . . . . 39

3.3.5 Atmospheric greenhouse effect after Anonymous 1 (1995) . . . . . . . . 39

3.3.6 Atmospheric greenhouse effect after Anonymous 2 (1995) . . . . . . . . 40

3.3.7 Atmospheric greenhouse effect after Anonymous 3 (1995) . . . . . . . . 40

3.3.8 Atmospheric greenhouse effect after German Meteorological Society (1995) 40

3.3.9 Atmospheric greenhouse effect after Gral (1996) . . . . . . . . . . . . 41

3.3.10 Atmospheric greenhouse effect after Ahrens (2001) . . . . . . . . . . . . 41

3.3.11 Atmospheric greenhouse effect after Dictionary of Geophysics, Astrophysics,

and Astronomy (2001) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42

3.3.12 Atmospheric greenhouse effect after Encyclopaedia of Astronomy and

Astrophysics (2001) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42

3.3.13 Atmospheric greenhouse effect after Encyclopaedia Britannica Online

(2007) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43

3.3.14 Atmospheric greenhouse effect after Rahmstorf (2007) . . . . . . . . . . 43

3.3.15 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44

3.4 The conclusion of the US Department of Energy

 

Viele Grüße    Klaus Friebe


...
06 Das IPCC spinnt sich das Klima zurecht ! [01][02]
Von Dr. Vincent Gray (Wellington, Neuseeland), 11. Juli 2008 <vinmary.gray@paradise.net.nz>
...
07 From:  Hans Penner <hanspenner@gmx.de>
To: "wolfram1@aaahawk.com" <wolfram1@aaahawk.com>
Subject: Kampf gegen Klimawandel beendet?
Date: Sep 22, 2008 1:56 PM

Offener Brief vom 20.09.2008

Dipl.-Chem. Dr. Hans Penner - 76351 Linkenheim-Hochstetten
Energiepolitischer  Sprecher der  Deutschen Zentrumspartei


An Frau Bundeskanzler Dr. Angela Merkel

Sehr geehrte Frau Dr. Merkel,

augenscheinlich ist der "Kampf gegen den Klimawandel", der die absolute
Priorität Ihrer bisherigen Politik bildete, beendet.  Die Führungseliten haben sich umgestellt und fordern jetzt nur noch die "Anpassung an den Klimawandel".  Den besten Beleg hierfür liefert der DIHK-Newsletter vom 04.09.2008:  "Der Klimawandel kommt - besonnenes Handeln ist gefragt".  Die Ansicht der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft dürfte sich durchgesetzt haben: "Da nur 3-4 % der globalen Treibhausgas-Emissionen aus Deutschland stammen, kann das Weltklima durch Verminderung der deutschen Emissionen natürlich nicht verbessert werden."

Ihre wissenschaftlich unhaltbare Behauptung, die Treibhausgase seien in der Lage, die Menschheit auszurotten, Ihre Grönlandreise und die Mammutkonferenz auf Bali haben sich als AgitProp-Maßnahmen herausgestellt.

Selbstverständlich enthält der DIHK-Newsletter immer noch die üblichen Desinformationen
zum Klima, denen die Fakten entgegenstehen: -  Das Klima wandelt sich, seitdem es Wolken gibt.
-  Die Extremwetterereignisse nehmen nicht zu.
-  Die globale Temperatur sinkt seit 10 Jahren.
-  Die technischen Kohlendioxidemissionen machen nur 1,2% der Gesamtemissionen aus.
-  Die globale Temperatur korreliert nicht mit dem Kohlendioxidgehalt der Luft,
sondern mit der Sonnenaktivität und der Wolkenbedeckung. -  Die IR-Absorption durch das Kohlendioxid der Luft war schon in der vorindustriellen Zeit praktisch gesättigt. -  Die Komplexität der Atmosphäre ist durch Computersimulationen nicht darstellbar.

Sinnlos sind Ihre Meseberger Forderungen nach Maßnahmen zur Emissionssenkung, die bis zum Jahr 2020 über 500 Milliarden ? kosten würden.  Sinnlos ist der Handel mit Emissions-Zertifikaten, der ganze Wirtschaftszweige zum Auswandern zwingt.  Sinnlos ist die zwangswirtschaftliche Subventionierung der in hohem Maße unwirtschaftlichen Windenergienutzung.  Sinnlos ist die in hohem Maße unwirtschaftliche Stromgewinnung aus Solarenergie.  Besitzer von Solardächern verkaufen ihren Strom zu dreifach überhöhten Wucherpreisen.  Die sogenannten Vergütungen werden den übrigen Bürgern über die Stromrechnung entwendet.  Sinnlos ist die Verheizung von Lebensmitteln zur Energiegewinnung und die damit verbundene Verschlechterung der Welternährungssituation.

Ich bin guter Zuversicht, dass sich trotz Ihrer Bemühungen die wissenschaftliche Wahrheit durchsetzen wird.

Ich hoffe auf eine starke Verbreitung dieses Schreibens in der Bevölkerung und hierdurch auf eine Beeinflussung des Wahlkampfes.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Hans Penner
(Energiepolitischer Sprecher der Deutschen Zentrumspartei)

PS: Dieses Schreiben ist die Kopie eines Offenen Briefen und kein Bestandteil eines regelmäßigen Nachrichtendienstes.
...
08 (1) Klimaschwindel

From: Egon Tampier [mailto:egon.tampier@gmx.de]
Sent: Tuesday, 11 November 2008 10:35

Klimaschwindel
Alle vier großen Klimaüberwachungszentren der westlichen Welt, welche die Durchschnittstemperaturen der Erde ermitteln (das berühmte "Hadley Center for Climate Prediction", das Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) der NASA, das Atmospheric Science Department at the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) und das Remote Sensing Systems in Santa Rosa, California (RSS)) belegen derzeit eine Abkühlung anstatt der angeblichen globalen Erwärmung.  Der beobachtete Anstieg von etwa 0,6 °C der Durchschnittstemperatur der Erde in den letzten hundert Jahren, der uns als "Klimakatastrophe" verkauft wird, wurde in einem einzigen Jahr rückgängig gemacht.  China hatte den kältesten Winter seit hundert Jahren und in Baghdad fiel zum ersten Mal seit Menschengedenken Schnee, zum ersten Mal in einer siebentausendjährigen Geschichte.  Nordamerika erlebte einen extrem kalten Winter und die größte jemals beobachtete Eisausdehnung wurde auf der Antarktis gemessen – während sich unsere Lügenkanzlerin sich noch von einigen Monaten werbewirksam vor angeblich abschmelzendem Eis auf Grönland photographieren ließ.

Während man keinen Wetterbericht für zwei Wochen zuverlässig vorberechnen kann, weil das Wetter ein chaotisches System ist, rechnen die Klimaschwindler aus, was in hundert Jahren passieren wird, und die Medien, schon immer die Huren der Mächtigen, beten uns täglich das Mantra von der globalen Klimakatastrophe vor.  Dabei gab es Kälterekorde auch in Texas, Florida, Mexiko, Australien, Iran, Griechenland, Süd-Afrika und in Argentinien.  Und auch in Grönland, was man aus dem Kanzleramt freilich nicht zu hören bekam.  Warum aber gibt es so wenig Widerspruch gegen die Lügen der Klimaschwindler?

Alle früheren Ideologien hatten Gegner.  Die roten Sozialisten hatten ebenso ihre Gegner wie die nationalen Sozialisten.  Selbst Liberale Denker haben bisweilen Widerspruch.  Dem mag man zustimmen oder nicht, aber daß es Meinungsfreiheit und -vielfalt gibt ist alleine ein Wesensmerkmal der Demokratie.  Diktaturen dulden keinen Widerspruch.  Daß sich gegen den Klimaschwindel nur so wenig Widerspruch regt, ist schon alleine von daher auffällig – aber indes auch leicht zu erklären:

• Die Parasiten von der Europäischen Union machen den Klimaschwindel zur Staatsreligion, weil er ihnen erlaubt, die Menschen noch mehr zu drangsalieren, die entmannten Restregierungen der Mitgliedsstaaten noch weiter zu entmachten und die eigene sonst nirgendwo evidente Existenzberechtigung endlich in einer Rolle als Planetenretter zu legitimieren.

• Die deutsche Bundesregierung, die ganz gleich welche Partei gerade der Berliner Quasselbude vorsteht stets maschendrahtzaunübergreifend klimaschwindelgläubig ist, kann mit der Drohung des großen Klimakatastrophe neue Steuern und Abgaben erpressen und trifft dabei auf wenig Widerstand, solange die Bürger durch geduldige PR-Arbeit der gleichen Öko-Religion anhängen.

• Im Zusammenhang mit dem so genannten Kampf gegen den Terror erlaubt der Klimaschwindel, weitere Überwachungs- und Gängelungsnormen einzuführen, denn ein Ökostaat muß ein Überwachungsstaat sein.  So atemberaubend schnell wie jetzt wurden seit 1933 die bürgerlichen Freiheitsrechte in Deutschland nicht mehr demontiert.

• Die Länder profitieren vom Klimaschwindel, denn er erlaubt ihnen, die Energieversorgung weiter zu demontieren und die Mobilität weiter zu rationieren.

• Die Kommunen reiben sich die Hände, können Sie doch Häuslebauer und Gewerbetreibende endlich so richtig wirksam mit Regenwassersteuer, Bodenversiegelungsabgabe und Zwangssanierungen drangsalieren.

• Die Beamtenschaft reibt sich vor Freude die Hände.  Kein Wunder bei Stundensätzen bis zu 25.000 Euro.

• Die Stadtwerke und Energieversorger freuen sich diebisch über noch höhere Preise – und über den profitablen Verkauf der zugeteilten Rationierungsscheine, die sogleich auf Kundenkosten zurückgekauft werden.

• Gleiches gilt für die Versicherungen, die immer behaupten können, der Klimawandel treibe die Schadensquoten hoch.

• Auch die Wissenschaftler sind korrumpiert: sie hängen von Fördergeldern ab, und die gibt es nur noch für Klimaschwindel-Forschung. Sie formulieren Forschungsanträge also wenigstens klimaschwindelfreundlich, oder heulen gleich mit der Meute.

• Die produzierenden Unternehmen schließlich leisten keinen Widerstand, weil sie marktunfähige Produkte durch staatlichen Zwang verkaufen und generell die Preise erhöhen können.  Die Wirtschaft auf diese Weise für eine Ideologie zu bestechen war eine Leistung, die die Marxisten, die Maoisten und die Nazis allesamt verpaßt haben.

• Die Linken, ganz gleich ob Sozialisten, Kommunisten oder gar die bekanntlich besonders mörderischen Maoisten, haben im Klimaschwindel ein willkommenes Instrument gefunden, gegen Privateigentum wirksam vorzugehen, besonders gegen das Privateigentum an Immobilien.

• Halbkriminelle Geschäftemacher haben auf der Basis des Klimaschwindels ganz neue Betrugsmodelle entwickelt, die zum Teil sogar die Sklaverei als Planetenrettung verkaufen.  Es hätte auch keiner gedacht, daß man Schweinefurze verkaufen kann.

• Die Bevölkerung schließlich liebt den Klimaschwindel, weil er in unserer heidnischen Zeit die Rolle der verlorengegangenen Religion ausfüllt.  Wenn wir schon nicht mehr an Jesus Christus und die Heilige Kirche glauben, dann doch wenigstens an den Klimaschwindel und die Öko-Priester vom IPCC.

Der Klimaschwindel wird uns also wohl noch eine Weile erhalten bleiben.  Anders als zu Zeiten des kalten Krieges, als die DDR ein leuchtendes Vorbild gleich hinter dem westlichen Gartenzaun und jeden Abend im Fernsehen besichtigen konnte, gibt es derzeit eine maschendrahtzaunübergreifende Einigkeit. Wahrlich ein Novum für politische Ideologien. Der BWL-Bote ist als freilich Skeptiker und Klimawandel-Leugner aber doch nicht ganz alleine.
Quelle: BWL-Bote

...
Read also: "Global Warming Theory has ‘failed consistently and dramatically’
Planet Has Cooled Since Bush Took Office’ - Gore Admits ‘I’ve failed badly’ " -  [01]
...

09
NO Global Warming - June 23 2009

Reason clouded by carbon obsession [01]

Peter Schwerdtfeger | June 23, 2009
Article from:  The Australian

ALTHOUGH there are many doubters of man-made climate change, I am not yet one of them. But I remain unconvinced that carbon dioxide is the sole bete noire. Two decades ago, I pored over the spectral properties of the infra-red radiation of this gas, which is essential to plant life, and found that it was almost completely overshadowed by the radiative properties of water vapour, which is vital to all forms of life on earth.

Repeatedly in science we are reminded that happenings in nature can rarely be ascribed to a single phenomenon. For example, sea levels on our coasts are dependent on winds and astronomical forces as well as atmospheric pressure and, on a different time scale, the temperature profile of the ocean. Now, with complete abandon, a vociferous body of claimants is insisting that CO2 alone is the root of climatic evil.

I fear that many supporters of this view have become carried away by the euphoria of mass or dominant group psyche. Scientists are no more immune from being swayed by the pressure of collective enthusiasm than any other member of the human race. I do not believe for one moment that undisciplined burning of fossil fuels is harmless, but the most awful consequence of the burning of carboniferous fuels is not the release of CO2 but the large-scale injection ofminute particulate pollutants into the atmosphere.

Detailed studies led by internationally acclaimed cloud physicist Daniel Rosenfeld of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem have revealed that the minute water vapour droplets that form around some carbon particles are so small as to be almost incapable of being subsequently coalesced into larger precipitable drops. In short, the particulates prevent rainfall.

Rosenfeld's research group has shown that humans are changing the climate in a much more direct way than through the release of CO2. Rather, pollution is seriously inhibiting rain over mountains in semi-arid regions, a phenomenon with dire consequences for water resources in the Middle East and many other parts of the world, including China and Australia.

Rosenfeld is no snake-oil salesman. As an American Meteorological Society medallist, he has an internationally endorsed research record in cloud physics that no living Australian can claim to emulate. It is more than 20 years since Australia was a knowledgeable force in cloud physics and cloud seeding. CSIRO's relevant division has long been disbanded and its cloud-seeding techniques based on the use of expensive silver iodide have been superseded by the Israelis using an inexpensive and far more natural product: sea salt.

Chinese and Israeli researchers have shown that the average precipitation on Mt Hua near Xi'an in central China has decreased by 20per cent amid increasing levels of man-made air pollution during the past 50 years. The precipitation loss was doubled on days that had the poorest visibility because of pollution particles in the air. This explains the widely observed trends of decrease in mountain precipitation relative to the rainfall in nearby densely populated lowlands, which until now had not been directly ascribed to air pollution.

Some of the most chilling evidence was presented by Rosenfeld's Australian-based research associate Aron Gingis in a 2002 submission to the House of Representatives standing committee on agriculture, fisheries and forestry concerning future water supplies for Australia's rural industries and communities.

The US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's satellite map of southeast Australia, enhanced by Rosenfeld, shows the frightening persistence and longevity of pollutant trails across vast areas, including the all-important Snowy Mountains catchments. It may well be concluded that the increasing emissions from the phalanx of brown coal-burning power stations at Hazelwood and other locations in Gippsland, Victoria, have substantially wrecked the natural precipitation processes over the once hydrologically rich Australian Alps.

If Rosenfeld's scientific interpretations are correct, then southern Australia would greatly benefit from the application of his discoveries. At the very least, Rosenfeld's conclusions should be accorded appropriate evaluation and testing by an unprejudiced panel of peers.

Yet his work so far has been ignored in Australia because it does not fit in with the dominant paradigm that holds CO2 responsible for reduced rainfall in semi-arid regions.

Scientists, like all other people, need to remain open to competing views and avoid the danger of being locked into tunnel vision through group obsession, which is what global warming seems to have become.

Peter Schwerdtfeger is emeritus professor of meteorology at Flinders University in Adelaide.
...


10
11

[ RETURN TO FRONT PAGE ] [THE NEXT PAGE]













.